Getting married should not be a government function. If the government were not involved in getting married there would be no need for federal or state laws to govern who can marry who.
Marriage started out as a religious ceremony and the act of getting married should be limited to a person's religious belief, or lack of religious beliefs. There is no need for the government to be involved. If a couple believes they should be married in a religious ceremony and be issued a piece of paper that says they are married that is fine. Each religion can decide if they want to allow same-sex marriages. If a couple simply wants to live together and be committed to each other there should be not need for them to have a piece of paper that says they are married. If either party to a commitment has significant assets the use of a lawyer to draw up a legal agreement would certainly be advisable.
Divorce should also not be a government function. When one or both people in marriage-type situation decide to separate the courts should only become involved if the couple can not mutually agree on separation conditions (division of assets, alimony, child support, child custody, etc.). Whether the couple has a religious marriage certificate or were just living together should not be an issue.
Current income tax rules have mostly illuminated the difference between being single and filing jointly but it might be necessary to further refine the tax rules. Income taxes should be based on an individual's income and a person's living status should not be a factor.
Employers and insurance companies all each need to decide whom they consider a "spouse". Some have already done this and provide benefits for non-married spouses/companions. While the benefits conditions certainly are a factor in determining whom a person wants to work for or buy insurance from, they should not be dictated by the government.
Social Security needs to be changed so benefits are determined for each individual and not the individual's marital status.
Monogamy should not be a government legal issue. Now a man or woman can be in a marriage-like relationship with multiple partners and it is perfectly legal as long as they don't formalize it with a marriage license. A piece of paper does not change the facts of the relationship. While I am not promoting non-monogamist relationships, the government should not be involved unless there is another legal issue (sex with a minor, child abuse, etc.).
I respect the various religious views on the marriage issue but the religious views should not dictate governmental law. Those that want to abide by a religious believe should be able to do so and those that want to form other types of relationships should be able to without government interference.
Marriage started out as a religious ceremony and the act of getting married should be limited to a person's religious belief, or lack of religious beliefs. There is no need for the government to be involved. If a couple believes they should be married in a religious ceremony and be issued a piece of paper that says they are married that is fine. Each religion can decide if they want to allow same-sex marriages. If a couple simply wants to live together and be committed to each other there should be not need for them to have a piece of paper that says they are married. If either party to a commitment has significant assets the use of a lawyer to draw up a legal agreement would certainly be advisable.
Divorce should also not be a government function. When one or both people in marriage-type situation decide to separate the courts should only become involved if the couple can not mutually agree on separation conditions (division of assets, alimony, child support, child custody, etc.). Whether the couple has a religious marriage certificate or were just living together should not be an issue.
Current income tax rules have mostly illuminated the difference between being single and filing jointly but it might be necessary to further refine the tax rules. Income taxes should be based on an individual's income and a person's living status should not be a factor.
Employers and insurance companies all each need to decide whom they consider a "spouse". Some have already done this and provide benefits for non-married spouses/companions. While the benefits conditions certainly are a factor in determining whom a person wants to work for or buy insurance from, they should not be dictated by the government.
Social Security needs to be changed so benefits are determined for each individual and not the individual's marital status.
Monogamy should not be a government legal issue. Now a man or woman can be in a marriage-like relationship with multiple partners and it is perfectly legal as long as they don't formalize it with a marriage license. A piece of paper does not change the facts of the relationship. While I am not promoting non-monogamist relationships, the government should not be involved unless there is another legal issue (sex with a minor, child abuse, etc.).
I respect the various religious views on the marriage issue but the religious views should not dictate governmental law. Those that want to abide by a religious believe should be able to do so and those that want to form other types of relationships should be able to without government interference.